Year : 2010 | Volume
: 1 | Issue : 1 | Page : 14--17
Pharmacognostic standardization of leaves of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae)
Y Murti, B Yogi, D Pathak
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura, N.H. #2, Delhi-Mathura Bye-pass, P.O. Chattikara, Mathura - 281 001, (U.P.), India
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura, N.H. #2, Delhi-Mathura Bye-pass, P.O. Chattikara, Mathura - 281 001, (U.P.)
Calotropis procera, belonging to the Asclepidaceae family, is present more or less throughout India and in other warm, dry places such as, Warizistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, and tropical Africa. Its common names are Akra, Akanal, and Madar. The leaves of Calotropis procera are said to be valuable as an antidote for snake bite, sinus fistula, rheumatism, mumps, burn injuries, and body pain. The leaves of Calotropis procera are also used to treat jaundice. A study on Calotropis procera leaf samples extracted the air-dried leaf powder with different solvents such as petroleum-ether (60-80ºC), benzene, chloroform, ethanol, and sterile water. Preliminary phytochemical analysis was done long with measurement of the leaf constants, fluorescence characteristics, and extractive values. Quantitative estimation of total ash value, acid insoluble ash, and water- soluble ash may serve as useful indices for identification of the powdered drug. Histochemical studies which reveal rows of cylindrical palisade cells and, vascular bundles may also serve as useful indices for identification of the tissues. These studies suggested that the observed pharmacognostic and physiochemical parameters are of great value in quality control and formulation development of Calotropis procera.
|How to cite this article:|
Murti Y, Yogi B, Pathak D. Pharmacognostic standardization of leaves of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae).Int J Ayurveda Res 2010;1:14-17
|How to cite this URL:|
Murti Y, Yogi B, Pathak D. Pharmacognostic standardization of leaves of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae). Int J Ayurveda Res [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Oct 2 ];1:14-17
Available from: http://www.ijaronline.com/text.asp?2010/1/1/14/59938
The plant, Calotropis procera (of family Asclepiadaceae), commonly known as Ak is used in many ayurvedic formulations like Arkelavana. The medicinal potential of Calotropis procera has been known to traditional systems of medicine for a while now with its leaves being widely used. The use of the plants, plant extracts, and pure compounds isolated from natural sources has always provided a foundation for modern pharmaceutical compounds.  Calotropis procera is a well known plant and has been traditionally used for diarrhoea, stomatic, sinus fistula, and skin disease, , and the leaf part is used to treat jaundice. There are many reports on the geographical distribution, habitat, and morphological characters of the plant. However, no work has been carried out on the leaves of this plant, which contain potentially useful ethnomedicinal drugs. Therefore, the present work was undertaken to study the pharmacognostic aspects of Calotropis procera leaves.
Materials and Methods
Fresh leaves were collected from the Calotropis procera plant growing in the medicinal garden of Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura, U.P., India. The plant specimens were authenticated (voucher specimen: NISCAIR/RHMD/Consult/-2008-09/1144/176) and the leaves were washed in running water and air-dried. The fresh leaf was then studied for pharmacognostic evaluation, including examination of morphological and microscopic characteristics and some preliminary phytochemical evaluation.
Instrumentation and techniques
Leaf specimens were cut into rectangular pieces that included the midrib and a portion of the lamina. For paradermal sections, specimens measuring 0.05 cm 2 were cut out from the midrib portion of the lamina. The leaf specimens were fixed and embedded in paraffin blocks,  followed by dehydration, infiltration, and sectioning,  and finally staining and photographing of the sections.  Photography was done by using a Nikon Labphot 2 microscopic unit. Descriptive features were matched with those included in standard anatomical books. , Air-dried leaves were powdered using a homogenizer and the leaf powder was considered as drug. The leaf powder and the extracts of the powder in different solvents were examined under ordinary day light and in UV-light (254 nm). The fluorescence was determined according to the methods of Chase and Pratt.  The total ash, water-soluble ash, and acid-insoluble ash content was determined by employing standard methods of analysis as described  in the Indian Pharmacopoeia (1966). Quantitative determinations of the powdered drug like physicochemical constants,  fluorescence,  and a preliminary phytochemical screening , were carried out.
Morphological characteristics of leaf
Calotropis is a large, bushy shrub with decussate, obovate, coriaceous, auriculate, leaves with acute, subsessile apices extraaxillary, umbellate, panicale inflorescene with purple corolla and erect lobes. ,, The morphological studies revealed the leaves to be subsessile, 6-15 cm by 4.5-8 cm, broadly ovate, ovate-oblong, elliptical, or obovate, acute, pubescent when young and glabrous on both sides on maturity [Figure 1].
Microscopical characteristics of the leaf
Transverse sections through the midrib showed an upper and lower, single- layered epidermis that was externally covered with a thick, striated cuticle, a few epidermal cells on both lower and upper surfaces, parenchymatous cells that were thin-walled and isodiametric to circular. Intracellular spaces were present in ground tissue and the stele was crescent-shaped and composed of bicollateral and open vascular bundles. The xylem consisted mostly of vessels and tracheids, and a strip of cambium was present between the xylem and phloem tissues. Laticifers were also present along with the phloem and parenchymatous zone.
The lamina which was dorsiventral with the mesophyll, was seen to be differentiated into a palisade and spongy tissue. The upper and lower epidermise were covered externally with a thick, striated cuticle. Below the upper epidermis were three rows of elongated, closely arranged, palisade parenchyma. Spongy parenchyma tissues were almost radially elongated with intracellular spaces. Central cells were irregular in shape; laticifers and vascular bundles were also present scattered in this region; the details are shown in [Figure 2].
The present study highlights the results of a comprehensive study on the microscopic parameters including the gross anatomical features, leaf constants, cellular composition, tissue organization, and cellular inclusion of the leaf. The lamina which was dorsiventral with the mesophyll, was seen to be differentiated into a palisade and spongy tissue. The upper and lower epidermis were covered externally with a thick, striated cuticle. Below the upper epidermis were three rows of elongated, closely arranged, palisade parenchyma. Spongy parenchyma tissues were almost radially elongated with intracellular spaces. Central cells were irregular in shape; laticifers and vascular bundles were also present scattered in this region; the details are shown in [Figure 2].
The results of the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the leaf samples are depicted in [Table 1],[Table 2],[Table 3],[Table 4].
By virtue of their photosynthetic machinery, leaves serve as a sink for several metabolites and as an important source of several bioactive compounds. The macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of leaves of Calotropis procera, the quantitative estimation of leaf constants, ash values, and fluorescence, and preliminary phytochemical screening of the leaf powder would be of considerable use in the identification of this drug. Empirical knowledge about medicinal plants plays a vital role in primary health care and has great potential for the discovery of new herbal drugs. These findings may be useful to supplement existing information with regard to the identification and standardization of Calotropis procera, even in the powdered form of the plant drug, to distinguish it from substitutes and adulterants. These studies also suggested that the observed pharmacognostic and physiochemical parameters are of great value in quality control and formulation development. In conclusion, the present study may be useful to supplement information with regard to its identification and, standardization, and in carrying out further research and revalidation of its use in the Ayurvedic System of Medicine.
The authors are thankful to the Management of Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura for providing laboratory facilities.
|1||Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. Saunders an Imprint of Elsevier; 2005. p. 41-7.|
|2||Alikhan I, Khanum A. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of India, Ukaaz Publication; 2005. p. 133-4.|
|3||Raghubir R, Rasik M, Gupta AJ. Healing potential of Calotropis procera on dermal wounds in guinea pigs. J Ethnopharmacol 1999;68:261-6.|
|4||Johanson. Plant Microtechnique. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Co;1940. p. 323.|
|5||Sass JR. Elements of Botenical Microtechnique. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Co; 1940. p. 275.|
|6||O'brien TP, Feder N, Mc Cull ME. Protoplasma 1964;59:364-73.|
|7||Easu K. Anatomy of Seed Plants. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1979. p. 550.|
|8||Fahn A. Plant Antomy. Oxford, England: Pergamous Press; 1974. p. 611.|
|9||Chase CR, Pratt R. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. Am Pharm Assoc 1949;38:324-31.|
|10||Anonymous, The Indian Pharmacopoeia. New Delhi: Govt. of India Publication; 1996.|
|11||Corner EJH, The Seeds of Dicotyledons. London: Cambridge University Press; 1976.|
|12||Brindha P, Sasikala P, Purushothamam KK. Bull Med Ethno Bot Res 1981;3:84-6.|
|13||Lala PK. Lab Manuals of Pharmacognosy, CSI Publishers and Distributors, Calcutta,1993.|
|14||Kokate CK, Purohit AP, Gokhale SB. Pharmacognosy. CBS Publishers and distributors; 2005. p. 169.|
|15||A Dictonary of India Raw materials and industrial products.'The Wealth of India',2000. p. 78-84.|
|16||Nandkarni AK. Indian Materia Medica 2000. p. 242-5.|
|17||Rastogi RP, Mehrotra BN. Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plant, Central Drug Research Institute Lucknow, National Institute of Science, New Delhi;1999. p. 147.|
|18||Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy. Vallabh Prakashan; 1994. p. 115-21.|